As plans for human settlements on the Moon grow, it’s important to explore how we can ensure they are globally representative and accessible. But, how?͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ ͏‌ 

Hello!

Welcome to the third edition of The Transmission! A six-part newsletter presented by Moon Dialogs featuring content on our three themes: Sustainable Moon, Accessible Moon, and Peaceful Moon.

This edition is focused on Accessible Moon. 🌔🚀

As human activity continues to grow on the Moon, it’s important to explore how we ensure human settlements are globally representative and accessible. To begin, we posed the question, “How do we engage a broad swath of nations in a coordinated lunar village effort?” to Dr. Annette Froehlich, an honorary adjunct lecturer at the University of Cape Town for the Master of Space Affairs and an editor with the Southern Space Studies. Below, we share her response along with a few from our audience.

Enjoy, and please share!

➤ The Big Question

How do we engage a broad swath of nations in a coordinated lunar village effort?

Written by Dr. Annette Froehlich

The use of outer space shall be for the benefit and in the interest of all countries. Even if this fundamental principle of the Outer Space Treaty was agreed upon by the international state community within the frame of the United Nations, its concrete implementation by space actors seems, still, to be very challenging. Upcoming projects such as the lunar village concept are looking for ways to include a large number of participant states from various regions worldwide. Indeed, the construction of a lunar village not only requires profound technical abilities and extensive financial resources but also, in particular, socio-political competence and benevolence from all parties involved. However, earlier initiatives for the common use of outer space have already shown how difficult it is to achieve a joint and combined approach.

The construction of a lunar village not only requires profound technical abilities and extensive financial resources but also, in particular, socio-political competence and benevolence from all parties involved.

Even the discussions around the notions of ‘common heritage of humankind’ or ‘mutual benefit’ seem like minor details at first glance but testify significant differences in terms of joint approaches and best solutions. In addition, it is not a matter of course that all partners, both space-faring countries and emerging space nations, will find a common denominator.

The opportunities for international coordination and collaboration

Building a village on the Moon will inevitably raise a multitude of socio-political issues because this fortified lunar settlement will be populated by interacting humans who are likely to come from different countries and cultures around the Earth. These colonizers are not only shaped by different social models but will also have diverging ideas of how this community of residents should be organized in order to function in a peaceful and sustainable manner, even under distress. This may comprise banal things like organizing a daily routine of every citizen—from civil registrations to security or garbage collection—but also different (legal) concepts on aspects such as the acquisition of property or intellectual property rights. These will all lead to intense discussions.

Moreover, even if current, major space-faring nations lead the way in the establishment and consequently also in the settlement of the lunar village, developing countries should receive a sincere opportunity to participate in this endeavour. This is not only to avoid earlier unfortunate mistakes during the so-called colonization era on Earth but to take advantage of our wealth of diversity, a unique asset of our world community and civilisation necessary to tackle the challenges that come with populating other celestial bodies.

Although established space-faring nations will most likely assume a large part of the technical and financial efforts of this common global project, emerging space nations will enrich this venture and its accompanying discussions with their proven concepts.

Although established space-faring nations will most likely assume a large part of the technical and financial efforts of this common global project, emerging space nations will enrich this venture and its accompanying discussions with their proven concepts. (One example is the organization of neighbourhoods and their communal goods.) Indeed, traditional methods and principles of community rules in decision-making processes within self-governing groups, or concepts of resource governance from Indigenous populations may allow us to find a more just and equal model of governance or natural resources exploitation for the benefit of all. Actually, in societies based on long traditional communities, good co-existence and harmony among all members of the group are essential for the survival of the whole population. This will be a vital common denominator for all as we seek the sustainable viability of the lunar village and its inhabitants.

 ➤ Share Dr. Froehlich’s piece! 

➤ The Comet Section

We posed “The Big Question” to our audience. Here’s what they had to say.

****

“The mindset of newer generations is to cooperate internationally rather than work in isolation and to seek peaceful and sustainable solutions…rather than engage in another space race. The “shared Moon” can only become reality by attenuating the trend in military technologies for defending national space interests while promoting space as a shared resource in a harmonized way.” — Claudiu, Romania

****

“The default for a large government-funded international space project is to use the International Space Station agreements as a model, which includes resource allocations that are proportional to initial contributions and the limited exchange of funds. The flaw in this model was freezing the contributions with no incentive after the development phase. The model works well for governments but is less clear for commercial partners or for general governance issues.” — Eric, New Zealand

****

“[To engage a broad swath of nations we must] provide a place where each nation can contribute their ideas, and more importantly, their people, to lunar exploration and habitation.” — John, United States

****

“A concise framework with clear goals would help the international community work together. New space needs to grow and develop, but it needs bounds and objectives. Digital exhibitions in a virtual lunar museum curated by states and other space actors could provide a place for expressing wants and visions. The exhibitions would be educational but also functional with the addition of tagging.” — Jourdan, United Kingdom

****

“Similar to the global efforts in the design and development of the ISS…we should encourage each nation to contribute the strongest aces of their ecosystem. Understanding that we need to create the best and most innovative reality should help put egos aside and allow for each nation to shine with its uniqueness.” — Michal, Israel

****

“An International Lunar Village should be mostly self-sufficient and ultimately, self-governing and an independent entity—meaning we have undertaken interplanetary settlement. To be sufficient on the Moon we need to commercially extract materials, water, and energy as well as build lasting structures. This is an international science and engineering project to excite younger generations. Want to make a difference? Think and act interplanetary.” — Simon, Germany

****

➤ Add to Your Tabs

Interested in learning more about international coordination and collaboration on the Moon? Check out these two Moon Dialogs’ salons hosted in April and June of 2021.

  • International Coordination for Lunar Exploration - The Practitioners’ View featuring Dr. Peter Martinez (Executive Director, Secure World Foundation), Dr. Marlene Losier (Principal of Losier & González, PLLC For All Moonkind), and Dr. Minoo Rathnasabathy (Research Engineer, Space Enabled Research Group)

  • International Collaboration for Lunar Bases featuring Dr. Yuguang Yang (Vice-Chair, IAF Space Transportation Committee), Dr. Jinyuan Su (Professor, Wuhan University Institute of International Law), Dr. Olga Volynskaya (Independent Russian space law and policy expert), and Col. Chris Hadfield (retired Canadian astronaut and chair of the board at the Open Lunar Foundation)

➤ What’s for Launch?

The International Astronautical Congress in Dubai is coming up in October! If you’re in the space industry and attending, let us know. We’d love to chat!

👋 Catch you Lunar!

We hope you enjoyed this second edition of The Transmission! Our next edition will be published in late October.

We’ll release “The Big Question” for our 4th edition and begin accepting submissions by early October.

Stay tuned by following us on Twitter or checking our website!

 

About Moon Dialogs

The Moon Dialogs is a partnership focused on governance and coordination mechanisms for the lunar surface. Visit moondialogs.org to get involved. The Transmission is prepared and edited by Victoria Heath, Program Manager at Moon Dialogs with help from the Conveners.

Feature image credit: Nancy Liang (CC BY-NC-ND)

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this newsletter do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Moon Dialogs or its stakeholders, conveners, and partners. Questions or concerns can be directed to victoria@moondialogs.org.

Moon Dialogs
340 S Lemon Ave #1606
Walnut, CA 91789
United States

Unsubscribe